Industry condemns ‘sexist’ language in Whisky Bible

21st September, 2020 by Owen Bellwood

Spirits professionals, including Our Whisky co-founder Becky Paskin, have condemned the “sexist” language used to describe whiskies in Jim Murray’s Whisky Bible.

Jim Murray published his 2021 Whisky Bible last week

The latest edition of Murray’s Whisky Bible was published last week and recognised whiskies from around the world. However, Murray has drawn criticism for descriptions of some whiskies, which often compare different spirits to women.

In a post on social media platforms including Instagram and Twitter, Our Whisky co-founder Becky Paskin cited some examples of Murray’s comments, saying that “something needs to be said”. She highlighted that “there are 34 references to whisky being ‘sexy’ and many more crudely comparing drinking whisky to having sex with women”.

In the book, Murray refers to a whisky from Welsh distillery Penderyn as celebrating “maltiness in the same way a sex addict revels in a threesome”. He also made these comments about a release from Canadian Club: “Have I had this much fun with a sexy 41-year-old Canadian before? Well, yes I have. But it was a few years back now and it wasn’t a whisky. Was the fun we had better? Probably not.”

In response to Murray’s “sexist and vulgar” language, Paskin and Forbes writer Felipe Schrieberg both called on brands to stop “ignoring this problem”.

Paskin said: “I have been aware of some of the ways he has described whiskies in the past and cringed but then got on with my day.

“But I managed to get hold of a copy of the 2021 edition and went through it to pick out some of the most disgusting reviews that were in there and it was really shocking. I had anticipated a couple, but there were more than I could have imagined.

“It came out now because I don’t think we should be making excuses for people like that anymore. One person should not have so much power that they can get away with saying or doing anything they want.”

Paskin said that comments such as Murray’s will have an impact on consumer perceptions of how to talk about whisky.

She added: “The amount of people who read those sorts of comments and assume that it’s OK to speak about whisky in that way is damaging.

“The message it is sending to the whisky industry as a whole and to whisky consumers is that women don’t really matter and they are there to be objectified.”

‘An attack on free thought’

Murray has responded to the criticism arguing the points raised online are “an attack on free thought and free speech”.

In a statement, Murray said: “This is not a matter of alleged sexism on the trumped up charges against me – which have clearly been concocted for very clear purposes – this is an attack on the very essence of what it is to be a critic in any sphere, be it music, art, sport, wine or whisky. In other words: an attack on free thought and free speech.

“We are entering very dangerous territory when people try to control the thoughts of others and wilfully distort the truth for their own ends. This is now a battle between free speech and humourless puritanism. I am not alone in finding this very sinister.

“I am not sexist; the Whisky Bible is not sexist, has never been sexist and I will not bow to this faux outrage. I have always fought the bully and I will do so here. Debate has been replaced by the baying of the mob, common sense and decency by straitjacketed dogma. Frankly, these people appal me because what they are doing is undermining society itself.

“How, in God’s name, can, for instance, likening a whisky to an orgasm be remotely construed as sexist? Last I heard, male, females, transgender people, everyone is capable of an orgasm. I am a professional writer and use a language that adults – for the Whisky Bible is designed for adults – can relate to. I paint pictures of a whisky. And if that, on the rare occasion, is the picture or sensation that formulates in my mind, then I say so. As I have every right to.

“Rather than write interesting, illuminating and compelling articles about whisky, other writers would rather engage in ‘cancel culture’ to [bring] down the world’s most successful author on the subject.

“Some one million people have bought the Whisky Bible since it first came out in 2003 – and in that time I have not received a single letter, email or text complaining of its content. Not one. Suddenly, though…this. Several people writing exactly the same thing on the same day. Strange that.

“I am famed for my ability to nose a whisky. And I can tell you that I can smell a huge rat with this entire manufactured and revolting affair.

“I have dedicated 30 years of my life, longer than anyone else on this planet, fighting for whisky and the whisky underdog, so people will discover great whiskies from wherever they may be in the world. This has put quite a few people’s noses out of joint. These outrageous and concocted allegations will not derail me in my life’s quest. My championing of great whisky will continue. My freedom of speech will continue. Whether these latter day Cromwellians like it or not.”

Becky Paskin (left) co-founded Our Whisky with Georgie Bell (right)

Vote with support

Since posting about Murray’s comments on Instagram yesterday (20 September), Paskin said that “about 98% of comments” she has received in response have been “overwhelmingly disgusted” at the language used in the book.

“It has almost encouraged other people to come out and say something has happened to them at a tasting, this is almost our ‘Me To’ moment for whisky,” she said. “Everyone has a story.”

Schrieberg and Paskin’s comments have been shared across social media by industry insiders including French drinks journalist Christine Lambert and spirits writer Alice Lascelles.

Paskin added: “The way the industry has reacted has been really positive, but what I haven’t seen is any brand saying we will no longer stock his book, we will no longer support him. But I think it might be too soon, this only happened yesterday.

“People can vote with their money and won’t buy it, and I also think that the industry should vote with its support. If you support what he says and the way that he objectifies women, women who are the blenders and distillers and make up the workforce that are making the whisky, then by all means support the bible, if that’s what you want to do. But I do believe that if you are against objectification then do something about it.”

10 Responses to “Industry condemns ‘sexist’ language in Whisky Bible”

  1. Robert says:

    Hello,

    The problem I see with this entire issue of accusing the Whisky Bible of sexism and inappropriate comments pertaining to whisky and women in correlation is how intellectually selective it is. Is Forbes for example about to release an article condemning the books of the monotheistic religions where in one example of Dueteronomy 13-21 or in the Torah book 5 named Devarim which proves a guide on the stoning of women who are found to not be virgins on their wedding night? You may think this is an absurd example. However, consider this, in world piety billions of people see these bibles as the universal law in deontological ethics. This percentage I am guessing is smaller as to how many people see Jim Murrays “Whisky Bible” as law for choosing and judging whisky. Billions of women in history have suffered because of the beliefs by men that see the bibles as a universal ethical law in governing everything to include women and lets say their “place” Now, I could use many other examples of this type of rhetoric used by Murray in classical literature or perhaps movies, art and much more. Do we condemn them all? Where do we start? Where do we finish? Who decides these thought to be ethical issues and why are their thoughts a universal that should govern us all. To write that Jim Murrays rhetoric is outlandish and hardly gives accuracy to judging whisky, something that is purely intrinsic to begin with, would have been a bit more intellectually accurate. But to label it as something that shouldn’t be read in consideration to it’s niche topic is intellectually a ridiculous claim considering the above thoughts.

  2. Stuart W Gunn says:

    Many thanks for highlighting the vulgarity printed in the Whisky Bible. Shocking actually. I will not be buying that book for sure. Indeed, I will now bin the older editions. There are more educated writers for us to enjoy as a business tool than Jim Murray and I sincerely hope our industry friends take action immediately.
    Many thanks for bringing this to our attention. Well done…!!!
    Stuart W Gunn

    • Ruaraidh says:

      @Stuart W. Gunn – have you not read the previous editions? Were they not written in the same style, using the same “sexist” slang? How come were you not offended by those editions? Or were you just buying them to make a statement, because they looked good on you shelf/coffee table?

  3. Carlton says:

    Some may find Murray’s metaphors lewd or distasteful, but I struggle to construe them as sexist.

  4. Matthew L. says:

    Murray’s “Bible” features very few actual tasting notes. He’s more concerned – as illustrated in his response here – about conveying his great and self-proclaimed importance to the whisky industry. There’s very little substance to be found among his catalog of “reviews”, but there’s certainly plenty of preposterous and sometimes rather explicit sexual innuendo. Frankly, I do not understand why anyone continues to supply this fellow with samples. Surely there are better spokespeople for our industry than this?

  5. Philip says:

    I don’t agree with this anti sexy talk at all. I am gay, and understand what it means to be in a minority often at the receiving end of bigotry. Of course, whenever I read references to sex and sexiness I don’t even think of a woman! From my experience I just don’t see any sexism in Murray’s writing. And I won’t feel objectified if someone speaks of me like that, comparing me to a sensual whisky. Just because a straight man makes a sexual reference, doesn’t mean he’s objectifying any or all women. It simply means he enjoys the full sensual pleasures of life. I have never bought the Whisky Bible before, this year I shall. All in the name of anti-Cromwellian free speech amongst adults.

  6. Cancel Culture Snowflakes says:

    Kudos to Jim for standing up against the cancel culture mob, there’s nothing sexist about metaphorising whisky in the way that he does. If you can’t relate to his points of reference then don’t buy the book. I’m not blindly defending him, some of these descriptions are lewd enough to make me wonder how he even thought of including them but is that good reason to destroy his career and blow the ‘objectification’ dog whistle to call for a complete boycott?

    Free speech, Becky. Why is people voting with their money not enough for you?

  7. Charlie says:

    Why does there have to be outrage over everything?

    This guy doesn’t have any more power than you do.
    You have the exact same power to publish a book describing every whisky you have ever tasted, right?
    You have the power to describe it in any terms you like, don’t you?
    You have the power to not read this book.

    That balance of power seems to me to be enough.
    I have no desire to ask this guy to change his book, and I wouldn’t ask you to change yours.

  8. Dr Worm (PhD) says:

    I do apologize for asking, but are the worst examples provided herein? In that case, may I ask where is the gender in “threesome” and “41-year-old Canadian”? How can you assume this are references to the female gender? And what is gender anyway? Does it still matter in 2020? As far as I know, the author is gay and/or is referring, metaphorically, to being aroused by male of non-binary individuals. All this assertions, calling the book and the author sexist, sound extremely bigoted to me. Shame on you for making people remember the old days when Conservatives where the conservatives and the guardians of morality.

  9. whiskeylover says:

    This faux outrage is nakedly self-promotional. What’s shocking isn’t the use of sexual metaphor in the book, it’s that so many brands and people have jumped on the bandwagon to ruin a man’s livelihood because of some rather clumsy but innocuous purple prose. What’s next, will they give us a list of 100 banal and appropriate things we may write about a beverage?

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to our newsletter